Base Pair Hydrogen Bonding Classification
Nucleic Acid Backbone Torsions
Base Pair Morphology Parameters
ONE SUGAR PUCKER FITS ALL: PAIRING VERSATILITY DESPITE CONFORMATIONAL UNIFORMITY IN TNA
5'-D(*GP*CP*GP*TP*AP*(2MU)P*(FA2)P*CP*GP*C)-3'
A DOUBLE HELIX
Click to show/hide 1 nucleic acid sequences
No Protein Sequence Found
Pallan, P.S., Wilds, C.J., Wawrzak, Z., Krishnamurthy, R., Eschenmoser, A., Egli, M.
Why does TNA cross-pair more strongly with RNA than with DNA? an answer from X-ray analysis. 
ANGEW.CHEM.INT.ED.ENGL., 42, pp. 5893 - 5895, 2003.
X-RAY DIFFRACTION
P 21 21 21
a = 24.429 b = 44.522 c = 47.332 (Ångstroms)
α = 90.0 β = 90.0 γ = 90.0 (degrees)
The structure was refined using the SHELXL-97 program. The R value is 0.133 for 17371 reflections in the resolution range 20.0 to 1.16 Ångstroms with Fobs > 0.0 sigma(Fobs) and with I > 0.0 sigma(I)
Asymmetric Unit coordinates (pdb format, Unix compressed(.gz))
Asymmetric Unit coordinates (cif format, Unix compressed(.gz))
Biological Assembly coordinates (pdb format) 1
Structure Factors (cif format)
Coordinates (pdb format, Unix compressed(.gz))
Coordinates (cif format, Unix compressed(.gz))
NMR Restraints (cif format, Unix compressed(.gz))
XML | Complete with coordinates (xml format, GNU compressed(.gz))